The Memory and Primary Hard Disk scores were the same for both platforms. It produced a higher Processor and Graphics score, although fell short of Parallels on Gaming Graphics. It then takes the lowest individual score as the base result.Īs you can see from the above results, round one goes to Fusion (but not by much). It includes a number of simple benchmarks to help users understand their system performance. The Windows Experience Index has been built into Windows since Vista. The results can be seen below: Windows Experience Index As a result I have run a number of popular benchmarks on each platform, in an attempt to give us some numbers to quantify. If forced I would probably state that Parallels felt slightly smoother when running Windows 7 Aero effects, but this would be purely conjecture. Now it’s time for the main event, as stated in my previous article I have used both platforms in the past and found it very difficult to identify any real world performance differences. The only time this could have an impact is if you were installing a large number of virtual machines regularly (possibly for testing purposes). However as both platforms provide a fully automated installation process I feel that both Fusion and Parallels provide an acceptable experience. The results can be seen below:Īs you can see, from an install timing perspective Parallels beat Fusion by approximately 30 seconds. As the first reference point I timed how long it took for the installation to complete (from first starting the virtual machine to the moment the virtual machine tools were finished installing). I ran the easy install option for both Fusion and Parallels, which I’m pleased to report completed successfully and was simple and painless for both products. This allows for a simplified, automated installation process, which sets up your account details, product key and the installation of the virtual machine tools (required for optimal performance). Installing the Virtual Machine:įusion and Parallels both offer “Easy Install” features (as shown in the image below for Fusion). The Mac was running a fully updated version of Mac OS X Lion 10.7.1 (11B26).īoth Fusion and Parallels had a clean install of Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 圆4 installed (downloaded from Microsoft TechNet) with the following identical virtual configuration:Īll other virtual machine settings were left default. I downloaded the latest versions of VMware Fusion 4 (4.0.1 - 474597) and Parallels Desktop 7 (7.0 14922) and both applications were installed on an 11” MacBook Air, with the following specification: The aim of this article is to dive deeper into these claims, hopefully discovering whether VMware Fusion 4 or Parallels Desktop 7 is the king of client virtualisation. VMware Fusion vs Parallels Desktop, which is better? On paper both of these platforms offer a very similar set of features and both claim to be the easiest and fastest way to run Windows on the Mac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |